Posted Jul 22nd 2010 at 3:26 pm
by Publius
WASHINGTON (AP) – A House investigative committee on Thursday charged New York Rep. Charles Rangel with multiple ethics violations, dealing a serious blow to the former Ways and Means chairman and complicating Democrats’ election-year outlook.

The panel did not immediately specify the charges against the Democrat, who has served in the House for some 40 years and is fourth in seniority. The charges by a four-member panel of the House ethics committee sends the case to a House trial, where a separate eight-member panel of Republicans and Democrats will decide whether the violations can be proved by clear and convincing evidence.
(more…)
Like this:
Like Loading...
July 22, 2010 | Categories: Corruption in Government, Elections Politics, Media Corruption, New Media News | Tags: Charlie Rangel, Congress, corrupt politicians, ethics, ethics committee, Ethics violation charges, Justice/Legal, Nancy Pelosi, progressive liberals, tax evasion, Ways and Means Committee Chairman | 1 Comment »
Atlas Shrugs
Thursday, July 22, 2010
The hatred of the good for being the good. Ayn Rand.
I was shocked (shocked, I tell ya!) to find out that the liberal goosestepping fascists over at the beastly Daily were behind the silencing of free speech. Poor, poor Tina Brown, oh how the mighty has fallen.
The Palin post removal was pushed by a beast who scribbles for the Daily Beast. The spammer is a notorious hater. He best reflects the moochers, looters and destroyers that Ayn Rand so brilliantly describes in Atlas Shrugged. This, yet again, best displays destroyers at work or at play…..
(more…)
Like this:
Like Loading...
July 22, 2010 | Categories: America's Freedoms, Constitution, Corruption in Government, Elections Politics, Media Corruption, Most Americans Reject Socialism, New Media News, Politics, Tea Party Conservatives | Tags: Brian Fries, Daily Beast, deception, Facebook rant, lies, mighty has fallen, progressive liberal agenda, revolutionary radicals, Sarah Palin, Tina Brown, Twitter | 1 Comment »
Associated Press | FoxNews.com
By Stephen Clark
Published July 21, 2010

AFP
June 26: President Obama and British Prime Minister Cameron talk at the conclusion of the G20 conference in Ontario, Canada.
At first glance, the similarities between President Obama and his new British counterpart, David Cameron, are unmistakable: Both leaders, who appeared together for the first time Tuesday at the White House, are young and charismatic and swept into office as reform candidates.
But that’s where the similarities end.
Obama has presided over what critics been described as an unprecedented era of government spending since he took office 18 months ago, from the $862 billion stimulus package to the nearly trillion-dollar health care system overhaul, while Cameron has embarked on an ambitious austerity path to dismantle the bloated bureaucracy that his predecessors built.
(more…)
Like this:
Like Loading...
July 22, 2010 | Categories: America's Freedoms, Corruption in Government, Elections Politics, Foreign Policy, Government, Healthcare, Most Americans Reject Socialism, National Security, New Media News, Politics | Tags: British Prime Minister Cameron, Canada, conservative, G20, Obama, Ontario, progressive liberal, similar leaders - but not | 1 Comment »

Note to the Supreme Court, FBI, CIA and perhaps INTERPOL. “Renegade” must be removed for the sake of our republic. Since this has never happened in the history of our nation, we the people must trust in God first, then in those who still have some honor and integrity to make the right moves to remove “Renegade” from his position. NOW IS THE TIME! (July 21, 2010; Editor Comment)
OBAMA MUST STAND UP NOW OR STEP DOWN (Was never eligible to be President)
By Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., Ph.D., J.D.
October 29, 2008; REPOST, JULY 21, 2010
NewsWithViews.com
America is facing potentially the gravest constitutional crisis in her history. Barack Obama must either stand up in a public forum and prove, with conclusive documentary evidence, that he is “a natural born Citizen” of the United States who has not renounced his American citizenship—or he must step down as the Democratic Party’s candidate for President of the United States—preferably before the election is held, and in any event before the Electoral College meets. Because, pursuant to the Constitution, only “a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of th[e] Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President” (Article II, Section 1, Clause 4). And Obama clearly was not “a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of th[e] Constitution.”
CLICK HERE TO WATCH A YOUTUBE VIDEO THAT REVEALS THE TRUTH.
Whether the evidence will show that Obama is, or is not, “a natural born Citizen” who has never renounced his American citizenship is an open question. The arguments on both sides are as yet speculative. But Obama’s stubborn refusal to provide what he claims is “his own” country with conclusive proof on that score compels the presumption that he knows, or at least strongly suspects, that no sufficient evidence in his favor exists. After all, he is not being pressed to solve a problem in quantum physics that is “above his pay grade,” but only asked to provide the public with the original copy of some official record that establishes his citizenship. The vast majority of Americans could easily do so. Why will Obama not dispel the doubts about his eligibility—unless he can not?
Now that Obama’s citizenship has been seriously questioned, the burden of proof rests squarely on his shoulders. The “burden of establishing a delegation of power to the United States * * * is upon those making the claim.” Bute v. Illinois, 333 U.S. 640, 653 (1948). And if each of the General Government’s powers must be proven (not simply presumed) to exist, then every requirement that the Constitution sets for any individual’s exercise of those powers must also be proven (not simply presumed) to be fully satisfied before that individual may exercise any of those powers. The Constitution’s command that “[n]o Person except a natural born Citizen * * * shall be eligible to the Office of President” is an absolute prohibition against the exercise of each and every Presidential power by certain unqualified individuals. Actually (not simply presumptively or speculatively) being “a natural born Citizen” is the condition precedent sine qua non for avoiding this prohibition. Therefore, anyone who claims eligibility for “the Office of President” must, when credibly challenged, establish his qualifications in this regard with sufficient evidence.
In disposing of the lawsuit Berg v. Obama, which squarely presents the question of Obama’s true citizenship, the presiding judge complained that Berg “would have us derail the democratic process by invalidating a candidate for whom millions of people voted and who underwent excessive vetting during what was one of the most hotly contested presidential primary in living memory.” This is exceptionally thin hogwash. A proper judicial inquiry into Obama’s eligibility for “the Office of President” will not deny his supporters a “right” to vote for him—rather, it will determine whether they have any such “right” at all. For, just as Obama’s “right” to stand for election to “the Office of President” is contingent upon his being “a natural born Citizen,” so too are the “rights” of his partisans to vote for him contingent upon whether he is even eligible for that “Office.”
If Obama is ineligible, then no one can claim any “right” to vote for him. Indeed, in that case every American who does vote has a constitutional duty to vote against him.
(more…)
Like this:
Like Loading...
July 22, 2010 | Categories: America's Freedoms, Constitution, Corruption in Government, Elections Politics, Most Americans Reject Socialism, National Security, New Media News, Politics | Tags: Born in Kenya, CIA, consequences now, Constitution, FBI, In God We Trust, Indonesian citizen, ineligible to be POTUS, Interpol, multiple lawsuits, must be removed from office, Philip Berg v. Obama, SCOTUS, Secret Service, unchecked executive power, usurper | 1 Comment »
Glenn Beck.com
July 21, 2010 – 13:05 ET
| Glenn Beck is seen here on the Insider Extreme broadcast, an exclusive feature available only to Glenn Beck Insider Extreme members. Learn more… |
GLENN: All right, You Don’t Need A Weatherman To Know Which Way The Wind Blows (Link). I told you last week that I’ve been doing research on something and I love it when a plan comes together. I’ve been doing some research on things and I think I have found their manifesto. If you want to understand what is happening in this country, if you understand how this is all coming together and what their designs are, all you have to do is read You Don’t Need A Weatherman To Know Which Way The Wind Blows and here’s what I would like you to do. We’re going to go over some of this and Jeffy and Stu and Pat I would like you to join me on this. In fact I have asked everybody to read this and I was checking everybody’s homework a minute ago. I’ve asked the newsroom and everybody to read it and then show me what sticks out to them, and show me the things that have already been done. So what I want you to do while I’m reading this, you can find it online at GlennBeck.com, it’s free (Link). This is the Weatherman’s manifesto. Their plan to destroy the United States of America. I want you to read it. Then I want you to e-mail tips to us on where you see the connections, where you see president-day things happening. I read it and it was breathtaking to me. I bought it in the next day and said you guys have to read this, and I brought it in to Stu, Pay and Jeffy. Do you all agree, am I taking it out of context, because I won’t want to behave like the White House or the NAACP. Am I taking this out of context to say you guys were blown away by this as well.
STU: Yeah to see it in action written out like that, it’s amazing.
GLENN: Because when you say the Weatherunderground and blown away context matters.
STU: There is no explosion in my bedroom.
GLENN: OK. Jeffy do agree that this is the manifesto for the president, or the people around him?
JEFFY: The people around him. Once you start reading about and get into it there’s is a lot in here that has taken place and is about to take place.
GLENN: Agree Pat?
PAT: Oh yeah.
(more…)
Like this:
Like Loading...
July 22, 2010 | Categories: America's Freedoms, Americans Reject Sharia and Islamic Supremacism, Corruption in Government, Elections Politics, Foreign Policy, Most Americans Reject Socialism, National Security, New Media News, Politics, Race Relations, UNIONS ACORN and SEIU | Tags: ACORN, Bernadine Dohrn, Bill Ayers, Black Panthers, communists, Conservatives, Free Gaza movement, oppressed, oppressor, Patriots, prairie fire, Socialists, Tea Party, Weather underground, where does the wind blow | 1 Comment »
CWNews Posted Comments