Written on June 23, 2012 at 8:15 am by FPP
While the White House, Eric Holder, and the liberal talking heads continue blaming Bush for the Obama administrations fumbles in the Fast and Furious gun walking operation gone bad, they cannot see the distinct difference between operation Wide Receiver and operation Fast and Furious. The differences are fairly profound and distinct.
The main differences are these: Wide Receiver involved Phoenix-based ATF agents, working with Mexican law enforcement in an attempt to build a case against violent Mexican drug smugglers. Fast and Furious on the other hand was an effort to make a case against American gun dealers and the Second Amendment of the United States. Both were orchestrated by their respective administrations with completely different goals. One was to go after criminals and the other was to go after the Constitution and law abiding citizens.
June 23, 2012 | Categories: 2012 Election, Amendment Rights, America's Disarmament, America's Freedoms, American Exceptionalism, Congress, Congress: Inquiries & Committees, Constitution, Constitutional Responsibilities, Consumer Issues, Corruption, Corruption in Government, Deficit, Drugs Smuggling, Due Process of Law, Economic Security, Education, Election 2012, Elections Politics, Electorate, Foreign Policy, Freedom Justice and Liberty, Government, Media Corruption, Most Americans Reject Socialism, National Security, New Media News, Political Contests, Political Incompetence, Politics, Poll Numbers, POTUS Deception, POTUS Elibility Issue, Progressives pushing for Marxism/Socialism, Propaganda, Radical Liberal Progressive Left, Redistribution of Wealth, Rejecting Political Correctess, Rights of States, Scandals, Terrorists Threats, Undermining Constitution, United States Court System | Tags: Agent Brian Terry, ATF, ATF agents, Barack Obama, big government, drug smugglers, Eric Holder, ethics, fast and furious, Featured, George Bush, gunwalking, hundreds killed, marked different operations, Mexican cartels, Phoenix, politics, violence, Wide Receiver | Leave A Comment »
Posted CWN: June 23, 2012
by Tony Lee
President Barack Obama has taken the Hispanic vote for granted, according to Mitt Romney in a much-anticipated speech to the National Association of Latino Elected Officials (NALEO) in Florida on Thursday.
“He’s taking your vote for granted,” Romney said of Obama. “I’ve come here today with a simple message: You do have an alternative. Your vote should be respected.”
Romney was referring to Obama’s inaction on immigration even though Democrats were in the majority in the House and Senate when he became president.
Romney said Obama, because he cannot sell his economic policies that have left more Latinos (11% as opposed to 8%) unemployed than the general population, will simply tell Hispanics that “things could be worse” and “imply that you really don’t have an alternative.”
June 23, 2012 | Categories: 2012 Election, Agency Regulation, America's Disarmament, America's Freedoms, Classified Intelligence, Congress, Congress: Inquiries & Committees, Constitution, Constitutional Responsibilities, Corruption, Corruption in Government, Deficit, Economic Security, Election 2012, Elections Politics, Electorate, Fiscal Responsibility, Freedom Justice and Liberty, Government, Government Appointments, Immigration, Individual Rights and Freedoms, International Affairs, Liberals Big Spending and Taxes, National Debt, National Security, New Media News, Politics, Progressives pushing for Marxism/Socialism, Propaganda, Redistribution of Wealth, Rights of States, Smaller Government, Undermining Constitution, Unfunded Union Pensions, UNIONS ACORN and SEIU | Tags: Barack Obama, Election 2012, governor romney, Hispanic vote, Latino Vote, legal immigration, long term solution, Mitt Romney, Obama taking for granted, political debates, politics, vote should be respected | Leave A Comment »