Truth Has No Agenda (GB)

Posts tagged “baby killing

‘Born Alive’ and ‘Partial Birth Abortion’ Barry [Barack] Beckons!

[FloppingAces.net]

February 24, 2012

Original Reader Post by: mlajorie2

[Editor:  This story is from an archive by Conservative Viewpoint (GDMP.net), our original website name.  It was posted directly from: http://www.floppingaces.netToday, Rush Limbaugh brought up a Politico posting in which Newt Gingrich was misquoted as bringing up the issue of "partial birth abortion" when, in fact, Newt had brought up an issue for which Barack Obama supported when he was Illinois State senator.  The issue that the Speaker brought up was 'infanticide' which has been deemed by some as post birth baby killing by a physician when a baby is born alive after a botched abortion.]

[INFANTICIDE] Caution: The graphic herein may be disturbing to some; Obama supports this!

Posted by: mlajoie2 @ 12:32 pm August 7, 2008

Vote for McCain-Palin, Nov 4th!We are being told that the Obama campaign plans to make a play for the Catholic vote. His margins among them are plummeting. An article by John M. Broder in the New York Times grapples anxiously with the problem. What can Obama do now? Maybe, as a [token] act of atonement, they can allow the younger Robert Casey to address the convention? (For those who don’t remember, Robert Casey Sr., governor of Pennsylvania was NOT allowed to address the convention, because he was pro-life. A lot of Catholics have not forgotten.)

The article even dares to broach the reason for the precipitous drop. In my mind, that can hardly be a question. Barack Obama has the most radical pro-abortion position in Presidential election history and the word is getting out.

How radical is it? Well for one thing, He opposed a ban on the killing of fetuses born alive during abortion in Illinois. Yes, you read that right. (This was started by the experience of a traumatized abortion nurse who was not even allowed to hold a surviving child, but instructed to put ‘it’ in the trash.) From Broder’s article, this was his rationale:

Mr. Obama has said he had opposed the bill because it was poorly drafted and would have threatened the Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade that established abortion as a constitutional right. He said he would have voted for a similar bill that passed the United States Senate because it did not have the same constitutional flaw as the Illinois bill.

(more…)


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 751 other followers