We have established that Obama’s war on coal assumed a massive, crash program of 100 new nuclear reactors — for optics purposes, keeping the cost of killing coal down, on paper — without which power the lights will necessarily go out. You cannot rule out half of our electricity supply and pretend otherwise.
And they point to this recent statement. “Nuclear energy is an important part of our own energy future.”
Which does not say he will promote any new reactors, of course. Just that he knows he can’t shut down the existing fleet, additions to which have been stalled since 1978. Meanwhile he plans to add no coal, and shut down the existing coal fleet. Electricity, after all, comes from those holes in the wall.
Obama also said to Iowa voters in October 2008 that he was “not a proponent” of nukes, and it is unlikely that anything has changed his core position.
And in response to which rhetoric I also note that on Friday he said this: “First, we need to continue to boost domestic production of oil and gas.”
Ah. Yes. Of course we must. Please point to his record of trying to boost production again? (more…)
March 18, 2011 | Categories: 2012 Election, Agency Regulation, America's Energy, America's Freedoms, America's National Security, Americans Reject Sharia and Islamic Supremacism, Cap and Tax, Economic Security, Election 2012, Elections Politics, Energy and Oil, EPA Regulations, Excessive Government Spending, Fuel Prices, Government, Media Corruption, Most Americans Reject Socialism, National Security, Natural Disasters, New Media News, Nuclear Radiation, Nuclear Security, Politics, POTUS Elibility Issue, Progressives pushing for Marxism/Socialism, Radical Liberal Progressive Left, The Economy, The Environment, Unemployment | Tags: 100 nuke plants, coal burning, gulf spill, hydrocarbon-rich acres abinito, Interior Secretary, NRC, nuclear is important, nuclear power, Obama, power grab, revoked 77 lease on 130000, safety | 1 Comment »