Adam Putnam facing questions about spending in expected run for governor

Adam Putnam did not disclose over a million dollars in spending before announcing his run for governor. What is he hiding?

Mary Ellen Klas, Tampa Bay Times

Agriculture Commissioner Adam Putnam has raised more than $9.4 million for a 2018 governor’s race he has yet to announce and, in the last two years, spent $1.8 million of it on a Lakeland-based political consulting firm that has failed to disclose how the expenses were paid.

According to reports filed with the Florida Division of Elections, 70 percent of the $2.6 million spent by Putnam’s political committee, Florida Grown, went to Silloh Consulting, operated by Justin Hollis, the 36-year-old political consultant and real estate investor who manages Putnam’s political fund.

Nearly $1.3 million went for the purpose of political consulting, according to the reports, but how much of that were checks written to vendors, pollsters, fundraisers, advertisers, opposition researchers, media interests and others?

His report doesn’t say, raising legal issues about whether the report is in compliance with state campaign finance law and federal tax law.

“The purpose of the law is: who gave it, who got it,” said Mike Cochran, who wrote much of the existing disclosure laws as the legal counsel at the Department of State’s Division of Elections in the 1990s and is now retired from state government. “If the expenditures are being made with the intent to not disclose, that would be something that is potentially a violation of the elections code.”

According to Division of Election records, Florida Grown paid Silloh Consulting over $14,350 for advertising, $16,300 for event expenses and supplies, $1,488 for food and beverage, $4,300 for meals, phones and utilities, but the biggest checks — as much as $92,000 in July of last year — were written for “political consulting,” “consulting,” or “management consulting.”

Hollis says it’s not accurate to conclude that he is personally making as much as $75,000 a month for the funds received by his consulting firm.

“Silloh Consulting is a Florida-based small business that consists of multiple individuals and offers a myriad of political consulting services, including fundraising, event planning, communications and outreach, among others,” he said in a statement.

Florida Grown paid $1,606 to fundraiser Meredith O’Rourke to reimburse her for travel, event expenses, food and beverage. But there is no indication of how much O’Rourke was paid for by Silloh Consulting for her fundraising efforts.

It raises the question of whether Putnam, and other candidates who have political committees, can use the broad term “political consulting” to shield the true nature of their expenses.

No one else from Putnam’s campaign finance team responded to requests for comment. Putnam is a Republican who is widely expected to announce his candidacy for governor later this year.

State election law requires any political committee to detail “the full name and address of each person to whom expenditures have been made by or on behalf of the committee or candidate within the reporting period” and specifies that the “primary purpose of an expenditure shall be that purpose … that comprises 80 percent of such expenditure.”

Mark Ard, external affairs director for the Florida Department of State, would not answer if it was acceptable for a consulting firm to be writing checks on behalf of a political committee to other individuals or entities and not providing a breakdown in the expenditure report.

He pointed to the statute and said: “Should you have questions regarding the enforcement of this statute or if a complaint were to be filed, please contact the Florida Elections Commission.”

Under federal tax law, political committees operate under the IRS 527 exemption if the money is used for an election, said Mark Herron, an Tallahassee lawyer and election law expert. But if a political committee is not using its money for election purposes, it must pay federal taxes on its funds, he said.

“I can’t tell if this is being raised and spent for an election because there is not product reported,” Herron said. “It could be raised and spent in connection with other elections but, if that’s the case, you should see other disbursements — for mailing or television advertising purposes.”

According to the Florida Grown disclosure report, Silloh Consulting paid $820 in federal payroll taxes. The political committee lists a total of $12,238 in “other disbursements.”

Ben Wilcox, lobbyist for Common Cause of Florida, said the issue ” points to a flaw in our campaign laws.”

He said Common Cause has attempted to get legislative support to change the law to require more specific descriptions of what serves as consulting “so you can’t just hide expenditures in that one word ‘consulting,’ which could cover many things.”

Meanwhile, he said, it is up to candidates to make sure their committees follow the intent of the law and provide explicit disclosure.

“Some people operate in the spirit of transparency and want to show an accurate portrayal of their expenditures and the sources of their contributions,” he said. “But if you want to hide money, there is always going to be a way to do that.”

Read more here.